<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CakeMail limited beta access now available!</title>
	<link>http://www.thecodekitchen.com/blog/2007/08/13/cakemail-limited-beta-access-now-available/</link>
	<description>We cook up tasty Web apps.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jerome's TOT</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodekitchen.com/blog/2007/08/13/cakemail-limited-beta-access-now-available/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome's TOT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecodekitchen.com/blog/2007/08/13/cakemail-limited-beta-access-now-available/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;My Yulbiz Montreal August report or How Facebook improves networking...&lt;/strong&gt;

My Yulbiz Montreal August report or How Facebook improves networking...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>My Yulbiz Montreal August report or How Facebook improves networking&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>My Yulbiz Montreal August report or How Facebook improves networking&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CakeMail now in beta &#124; Montreal Tech Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodekitchen.com/blog/2007/08/13/cakemail-limited-beta-access-now-available/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>CakeMail now in beta &#124; Montreal Tech Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecodekitchen.com/blog/2007/08/13/cakemail-limited-beta-access-now-available/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>[...] I went through the beta. First, the registration email was ironically flagged as spam, which should be the last thing to happen to a newsletter platform. It also lacked any info about the pricing, and I haven&#8217;t been able to customize the interface as it was advertised, or get to an option to white-label it. Now, a comparison with Campaign Monitor is due, which is actually the standard for newsletters. I found Cake was much easier to use, the process of creating and sending a mailing is much more logical than Campaign Monitor&#8217;s crowded interface and options. And I would say I will be using for current projects instead of CampaignMonitor, if it&#8217;s priced right. You can also go try CakeMail. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I went through the beta. First, the registration email was ironically flagged as spam, which should be the last thing to happen to a newsletter platform. It also lacked any info about the pricing, and I haven&#8217;t been able to customize the interface as it was advertised, or get to an option to white-label it. Now, a comparison with Campaign Monitor is due, which is actually the standard for newsletters. I found Cake was much easier to use, the process of creating and sending a mailing is much more logical than Campaign Monitor&#8217;s crowded interface and options. And I would say I will be using for current projects instead of CampaignMonitor, if it&#8217;s priced right. You can also go try CakeMail. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
